Why energy bail-outs will do more harm than good

为何能源救助反而弊大于利

Editor's Picks from The Economist

2026-03-30

6 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

A handpicked article read aloud from the latest issue of The Economist. As countries consider interventions to shield households and businesses from the energy shock, we make the case against energy bail-outs. Topics covered: Energy bail-outs Iran war energy shock Energy crisis of 2022 Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • The Economist.

  • Hello and welcome to Editor's Picks.

  • Ethan Wu here.

  • I'm one of the hosts of Money Talks, our business and finance podcast.

  • You're about to hear an article from the latest edition of The Economist.

  • Thanks for listening.

  • During the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy crisis caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022,

  • governments opened their checkbooks and made heavy-handed interventions as they sought to cushion the damage

  • that was being inflicted on households and businesses.

  • So it is with the energy crisis stemming from the Iran war,

  • which has sent the price of oil and liquefied natural gas, LNG, rocketing.

  • Spain has slashed VAT on fuel and household electricity.

  • Italy has cut petrol duties.

  • South Korea has capped prices at the pump, and Japan is spending more on subsidies to limit them.

  • Britain's government is considering subsidising the energy bills of welfare claimants

  • and promises to crack down on profiteering.

  • Even in energy-secure America, Democrats have called for windfall taxes on oil companies,

  • with the revenue channel to households.

  • Such interventions will do more harm than good.

  • High prices and fat profits tell consumers to economise on energy while encouraging producers to find and sell more.