2026-08-27
1 小时 15 分钟I'm Dan Kurtz-Phelan and this is the Foreign Affairs interview.
In terms of the sort of broader case for why we had to remain
militarily engaged in Afghanistan year after year after year,
the core thesis was we have to fight them over there
so that we don't fight them over here in the West.
Now those exact words were spoken in Western parliaments
and now five years on, you know I think empirically knock on wood, it's just not the case, right?
If you look at the fact that for 20 years
Afghanistan was such a high priority to the United States
that the US expended blood and an enormous amount of treasure
to be there to prop up the Afghan government,
to build up the Afghan security forces,
to prosecute a counterterrorism campaign
and then all at once the US can leave the country,
have very little engagement with Afghanistan,
have it completely drop off the policy map and nothing happens,
has to make you question the strategic choices
and judgments during that long period of time.
Five years ago this month, America ended its war in Afghanistan.
The exit was chaotic, Taliban forces swept through the country