Influencers v evidence-based medicine (part two)

网红对决循证医学(第二部分)

Babbage from The Economist

2026-06-03

34 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

There's a lot of medical misinformation online. How do you know who, or what, to trust? To help you think through the fog, we're bringing you two conversations on health, medicine, evidence and trust in the digital age. In this second episode, we discuss how scientists build consensus and what that can teach the rest of us about navigating an era of confusing, social-media-driven health advice. Guests and hosts: Helen Pearson, author of “Beyond Belief” and a senior editor at NatureAlok Jha, The Economist's science and technology editor Topics covered: Evidence-based medicineClinical trialsArtificial intelligence Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts. Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • This episode of Babbage is supported by IDA Ireland.

  • With the highest share of STEM graduates per capita in the EU,

  • IDA Ireland can help source the skills you need to internationalize and thrive.

  • Visit idaireland.com to learn more.

  • The Economist.

  • Last week on Babbage, doctor and author Deb Cohen explained how digital technology,

  • from social media to wearable devices and now artificial intelligence, are teaming up to hijack our health.

  • Social media is a certainty factory, where medicine by definition is uncertain.

  • And medical research rarely is these big breakthrough sort of treatments, although sometimes headlines report it that way.

  • It's often shavings of risk.

  • Anecdotes, basically.

  • Anecdotes, yeah.

  • It's an anecdote factory.

  • There's absolutely really good things about being online.

  • But what has happened is it's become a way, a very quick way,

  • to market and commercialize interventions that aren't always evidence-based.

  • All of this makes it especially hard to know who or what to trust.

  • Our guest today explains that this is actually not a new thing when it comes to health.

  • You could argue that there's not some sudden pushback against evidence,

  • but actually that the use of evidence is relatively recent