2026-10-15
1 小时 1 分钟I'm Dan Kurtz-Phelan, and this is the Foreign Affairs Interview.
This expectation that we are one coercive push away from regime collapse or economic collapse,
I think is really magical thinking,
and it is not going to, in any way, put us in a better place.
I'm not saying that this could go on forever now with the sanctions and the and the blockade.
No, I think at some point there might be a break breaking point.
I just don't know if we are there yet.
I think we tend to underestimate the capacity of Iran as a state, and also the society, to absorb pain.
Nearly eight months since it began, the war in Iran has settled into a grim stalemate.
Two essays in the new issue of Foreign Affairs consider just how long this stalemate could continue
and what decision-makers in Tehran think they can achieve in the coming months.
In "The New Forever Wars," Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group argues
that Iran prefers deadlock to any plausible compromise with Washington.
In "Why Iran Escalates," Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar of Texas A&M argues
that Tehran will pursue a more ambitious goal:
forcing the United States out of the Middle East altogether.
Senior Editor Daniel Block spoke with Tabaar and Vaez on Monday, October 12th,
to discuss U.S. and Iranian strategies, the future of Iran's Axis of Resistance,
and the durability of a regime that Western policymakers have often underestimated.
Ali, Mohammad, welcome to the Foreign Affairs Interview.