Why You Need a Teacher (even if you're sure you don't).

为什么你需要一位老师(即使你确定你不需要)。

Good Life Project

自我完善

2018-01-18

22 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

If you don't have a teacher, you're cheating yourself. Wow, I do NOT like those words! In fact, I resisted the whole notion of a teacher for decades. Friends and colleagues, from artists to athletes, execs to educators would all tell me about their amazing mentors, teachers, coaches and gurus. My eyes would roll. I'm an autodidact, I'd tell myself, I learn best when I'm in control. I don't need a teacher or a coach, I just need access to information. Turns out, that is a complete and utter lie. To go from being a newbie to being really good at anything takes a ton of work. Still, most people, with enough motivation, can get there. To go from really good to excellent takes a whole different level of effort known as "deliberate practice." But, to go from excellent to stunningly-good, to step into that final, brutally-hard to access top 5% of your potential, that takes something entirely different. Something called "directed practice." And, here's the thing, you cannot DO directed practice without a teacher. End of story. No exceptions. What deliberate and directed practice are, and how a teacher becomes a critical player, no matter how smart you are, is what we're talking about in today's GLP Riff. Good Life Science Update. And, on the science side of things, today, we're diving into a cool new study from a team out of University of Illinois about how being in nature affects your ability to focus your attention, stay engaged longer and go better work. We've known about the effects of nature on your body and mind, it's an amazing Vitality Bucket filler. But, now, we've got research to show how it can effect your ability to do your best work. To fill your Contribution Bucket, too. And, as always, for those who want to go to the source, here's a link to the full study. ------------- Have you discovered your Sparketype yet? Take the Sparketype Assessment™ now. IT’S FREE (https://sparketype.com/) and takes about 7-minutes to complete. At a minimum, it’ll open your eyes in a big way. It also just might change your life. If you enjoyed the show, please share it with a friend. Thank you to our super cool brand partners. If you like the show, please support them - they help make the podcast possible. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • So let's say you're trying to get really good at something.

  • Best you can possibly be is practice enough?

  • Is this thing called deliberate practice enough, or is there something else that's really important?

  • Turns out there is.

  • It's this thing called directed practice.

  • And we're going to talk about that and the role of somebody else in that in today's good Life project riff.

  • And along with that, some really cool new research on how nature affects our attention and engagement.

  • And it just keeps piling on the argument for us getting out of our indoor areas.

  • I'm Jonathan Fields, and this is good life project.

  • So how do you get really good at something?

  • That's been a question that's been sort of persistently on my mind for many, many years, probably decades, actually.

  • As somebody way, way, way back in the ancient days when I was in college, I actually came really close to studying performance psychology because I've just been fascinated by it.

  • I was a gymnast as a kid, and I had this sort of predisposition for discipline and progress.

  • Just one of the things that, for that particular sport, is critically important, because even though you compete as a team, there's a really big solo aspect to it.

  • I became really fascinated with what makes people do the work to become extraordinary at anything chunky years down the road.

  • Reading Malcolm Gladwell's famous book, outliers introduced the world to the research of Kay Anders Ericsson, who is one of the leading researchers in the field of excellence, expertise and greatness.

  • What allows somebody to tap their fullest potential, become extraordinary, become world class great.

  • The 10,000 hours rule was popularized as this thing that you had to, quote, put in that amount of time in order to become extraordinary in any given field.

  • We now know that, in fact, the 10,000 hours is a fairly gross misrepresentation of the original research by Ericsson.

  • I had a chance to actually sit down with Ericsson a while back and explore in a lot more detail, what does it actually take to become extraordinary, potentially the best in the world, or at least the best that you are capable of becoming in any given pursuit that matters to you.