Eric Jang – Building AlphaGo from scratch

贾力克·杨——从零开始打造AlphaGo

Dwarkesh Podcast

2026-05-16

2 小时 37 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

Eric Jang walks through how to build AlphaGo from scratch, but with modern AI tools. Sometimes you understand the future better by stepping backward. AlphaGo is still the cleanest worked example of the primitives of intelligence: search, learning from experience, and self-play. You have to go back to 2017 to get insight into how the more general AIs of the future might learn. Once he explained how AlphaGo works, it gave us the context to have a discussion about how RL works in LLMs and how it could work better – naive policy gradient RL has to figure out which of the 100k+ tokens in your trajectory actually got you the right answer, while AlphaGo’s MCTS suggests a strictly better action every single move, giving you a training target that sidesteps the credit assignment problem. The way humans learn is surely closer to the second. Eric also kickstarted an Autoresearch loop on his project. And it was very interesting to discuss which parts of AI research LLMs can already automate pretty well (implementing and running experiments, optimizing hyperparameters) and which they still struggle with (choosing the right question to investigate next, escaping research dead ends). Informative to all the recent discussion about when we should expect an intelligence explosion, and what it would look like from the inside. Watch on YouTube. Read the transcript. And check out the flashcards I wrote to retain the insights. Sponsors * Cursor‘s agent SDK let me build a pipeline to generate flashcards for this episode. For each card, I had an agent read the transcript, ingest blackboard screenshots, generate an SVG visual, and run everything through a critic. A durable agent is much better at this kind of work than a chain of LLM calls, and Cursor’s SDK made it easy. Check out the cards at flashcards.dwarkesh.com and get started with the SDK at cursor.com/dwarkesh * Jane Street gave me a real deep-dive tour of one of their datacenters. I got to ask a bunch of questions to Ron Minsky, who co-leads Jane Street’s tech group, and Dan Pontecorvo, who runs Jane Street’s physical engineering team. They were willing to literally pull up the floorboards and take out racks to explain how everything works. Check out the full tour at janestreet.com/dwarkesh Timestamps (00:00:00) – Basics of Go (00:08:17) – Monte Carlo Tree Search (00:32:04) – What the neural network does (01:00:33) – Self-play (01:25:38) – Alternative RL approaches (01:45:47) – Why doesn't MCTS work for LLMs (02:01:09) – Off-policy training (02:12:02) – RL is even more information inefficient than you thought (02:22:16) – Automated AI researchers Get full access to Dwarkesh Podcast at www.dwarkesh.com/subscribe
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Today, I'm here with Eric Zhang, who was most recently vice president of AI at 1 x Technologies,

  • before that senior research scientist at what is now Google DeepMind Robotics.

  • And you've been on sabbatical for the last few months.

  • One of the things you've been doing is rebuilding and improving and hacking on AlphaGo.

  • And so today what we 're going to do is you 're going to explain building AlphaGo from scratch and what it tells us

  • about the future of AI research and development.

  • But before we get to that, Why is AlphaGo interesting?

  • Why is this the project you decided to do on sabbatical rather than just hanging out at the beach?

  • Sure, yeah.

  • I like making things, and.

  • AlphaGo and GoAI is one of those things that really got me into the field.

  • When I saw the kind of early breakthroughs on AlphaGo in 2014,

  • 2015, 2016, and so forth, it was just profound to see how smart AI systems could become

  • and the kind of computational complexity class that they could tackle with deep learning.

  • This is a problem that has long been understood to be kind of intractable for a search,

  • and yet it was solved through through deep learning.

  • And so that was quite mysterious to me.

  • And I've always wanted to understand that phenomenon a little bit better.

  • My training is often in deep neural nets for robotics,

  • where the decisions made by the neural networks are a bit more intuitive.