Harvey Mansfield on Machiavelli, Straussianism, and the Character of Liberal Democracy

哈维·曼斯菲尔德论马基雅维利、施特劳斯主义及自由民主的性格

Conversations with Tyler

2026-03-18

49 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

Sign up for the live Conversations with Tyler recording with Craig Newmark at 92NY! Few living scholars can claim to have shaped how we read Machiavelli as decisively as Harvey Mansfield. His new book, The Rise and Fall of Rational Control, argues that Machiavelli didn't just write about politics—he invented the intellectual machinery of the modern world, starting with the concept of "effectual truth," which Mansfield credits as the seed of modern empiricism. At 93, after 61 years of teaching at Harvard, Mansfield remains cheerfully unimpressed by most of contemporary philosophy, convinced that the great books are self-sustaining, and that irony is what separates serious philosophy from the rest. Tyler and Harvey discuss how Machiavelli's concept of fact was brand new, why his longest chapter is a how-to guide for conspiracy, whether America's 20th-century wars refute the conspiratorial worldview, Trump as a Shakespearean vulgarian who is in some ways more democratic than the rest of us, why Bronze Age Pervert should not be taken as a model for Straussianism, the time he tried to introduce Nietzsche to Quine, why Rawls needed more Locke, what it was like to hear Churchill speak at Margate in 1953, whether great books are still being written, how his students have and haven't changed over 61 years of teaching, the eclipse rather than decline of manliness, and what Aristotle got right about old age and much more. Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on the new dedicated Conversations with Tyler channel. Recorded January 22nd, 2026. This episode was made possible through the support of the John Templeton Foundation. Other ways to connect Follow us on X and Instagram Follow Tyler on X Sign up for our newsletter Join our Discord Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Bumper 00:00:36 - Intro 00:01:20 - Machiavelli's "Effectual Truth" 00:05:56 - Conspiracy Theories 00:12:39 - The Vulgarity of Democracy 00:16:35 - The Future of Straussianism 00:34:30 - Why the Supply of Great Books has Dried Up 00:37:56 - Rational Control vs. Spontaneous Order 00:40:25 - Winston Churchill 00:43:30 - Students at Harvard 00:46:05 - Manliness 00:47:34 - Death and Politics 00:48:56 - Outro  Image Credit: Erin Clark via Getty Images
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Hey listeners, this is Dallas, one of the producers of Conversations with Tyler.

  • On April 14th, join Tyler at the 92nd Street Y in New York City for a live taping of Conversations with Tyler,

  • featuring Craig Newmark, the founder of Craigslist and Craig Newmark Philanthropies.

  • Tyler and Greg will discuss trust, cybersecurity, and the building blocks of resilient civic institutions in the digital age,

  • along with plenty more, I'm sure.

  • Tickets are selling quickly, so be sure to grab yours before they're gone.

  • You can find the link to buy tickets at the top of the show notes.

  • Hope to see you there!

  • Hello, everyone, and welcome back to Conversations with Tyler.

  • Today I'm speaking with the great Harvey Mansfield, and Harvey has a new and excellent book out called The Rise and Fall of Rational Control.

  • Harvey, welcome.

  • Thank you for having me.

  • Pleasure to be here.

  • Now, given that Machiavelli had no real sense of modern science and its fruits, what ends up being missing from his political thought?

  • Well, he didn't have no idea of modern science.

  • In fact, I would say that his notion of effectual truth is the beginning of modern science.

  • The effectual truth, he says, is what comes out of the truth, or what is the effect.

  • If you say to somebody, I love you, the effectual truth of that is, I want something from you.

  • So the effectual truth is the upshot, sometimes not necessarily the intent of the statement.

  • So you must judge then from cause to effect.