This is A.O.
scott.
I'm a critic at the New York Times.
What I do and what the other critics here do is part of the same project that all of the journalists at the New York Times work on every day to give you clarity and perspective and above all,
a deeper understanding of the world.
When you subscribe to the New York Times,
it's not just here are the headlines, but here's the way everything fits together.
If you'd like to subscribe, Please go to nytimes.com subscribe.
From the new york times.
I'm rachel abrams, and this is the daily.
For years,
social media companies have relied on an impenetrable First Amendment protection to shield them from legal claims that their products are dangerous to children.
But now a new cluster of plaintiffs are trying a different tact.
Today,
my colleague Cecilia Kang explains why these lawsuits pose an existential threat to social media giants and how those companies are likely to defend themselves.
It's Thursday, january 29th.
Trouble for TikTok as a group of attorney generals in several states look into whether the video sharing platform TikTok is harmful for children,
internal research at Facebook found that its photo sharing app Instagram.
Can harm the mental health of millions of young users.
Research shows 95% of teens are on social media.