2026-01-19
11 分钟For Scientific American Science Quickly, I'm Kendra Peer-Lewis in for Rachel Feldman.
You're listening to our weekly science news roundup.
First up, Earlier this month, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency published a new rule signaling a major change to the way it counts for the impact of certain air pollutants on human health.
Many health experts say the shift will likely lead to increased air pollution and worse health outcomes.
Andrea Thompson, Siam's Senior Editor for Life Sciences,
is here to give us a clearer understanding of what the agency is doing and what that means for the air we all breathe.
Hi, Andrea.
Thanks for joining us today.
Thanks for having me.
So my understanding is that in general,
the EPA uses a type of cost-benefit analysis to understand the impact of an environmental regulation.
Can you talk a bit about how prior to this rule change, the EPA measured these costs and benefits?
Yeah, so in general,
the science for how you've sort of calculate how much a regulation will cost so the economic benefit you get from it has been pretty well established over several decades.
So for at least for the benefits part,
it starts with health studies that compare areas where say a certain pollutant is high in areas where it's low and look at the differences in hospitalizations and premature deaths and other health indicators.
and controlling for other factors that may influence those,
and come up with a model that you can use to see,
okay, if this pollutant goes up or down, how much do those health indicators change?