Whistleblowing in the UK, Ep. 1: The cost of speaking up

英国揭密行动,第一季:挺身而出的代价

Behind the Money

2025-12-08

30 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

For years, corporate whistleblowers in the UK have found themselves in an unenviable predicament. They’re encouraged to report wrongdoing, but at the same time they often feel like they’ve risked everything: their careers and livelihoods in exchange for little. In this special two-part series, we explore why critics think this system is failing whistleblowers and what the UK can do to change things. In part one: We hear from two whistleblowers who share why they blew the whistle and what went wrong after. Plus, the FT’s financial regulation editor Martin Arnold and Mary Inman, the attorney who represented well-known whistleblowers such as Frances Haugen of Meta and Tyler Shultz of Theranos, discuss the systemic issues whistleblowers have faced in the UK.    Part two airs next Monday, December 15. The FT does not use generative AI to voice its podcasts. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  For further reading: Should corporate whistleblowers get paid? Whistleblowers could earn millions as HMRC targets tax fraud Corporate whistleblowing in the UK needs a shake-up Asset management: inside the scandal that rocked GAM  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  Behind the Money host Michela Tindera is on X (@mtindera07) and Bluesky (@mtindera.ft.com), or follow her on LinkedIn for updates about the show and more. Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Back in 2006,

  • Daniel Sheard was working as an asset manager in London when he heard from an old colleague with a new opportunity.

  • We met up at a coffee shop in the Royal Exchange in the heart of the city and he was looking for a co-manager to help him run a significant pool of money.

  • At the time it was about 3 billion euros with a pretty much go anywhere mandate.

  • Sounded a lot of fun.

  • This old colleague was a guy named Tim Haywood.

  • I'd known Tim many years before and we'd got on and that combined with sort of the bureaucracy and slow-moving nature of where I was working at the time really was,

  • it was an attractive offer.

  • So Daniel took the job and for a while he was happy in this new position.

  • He says that he and Tim grew to be seen as guardians of this fund that they ran together.

  • There was a standing joke within the sales and marketing team that we were basically the mother and the father of the absolute return fund.

  • And you know how husband and wife argue.

  • Well, sometimes we argued, but usually I won.

  • Though they'd known each other for a long time,

  • Daniel says he felt like they approached their work differently.

  • Tim was very much a risk taker.

  • Tim was always looking for the outside odds opportunity.

  • Very much like an equity investor looking for the fabled 10 bagger.

  • So very perhaps diametrically opposed approaches to investment.

  • But perhaps that's why we work together so well such a long time.