2025-10-25
47 分钟The Economist.
It's been a tough year for American universities.
Across the country, Donald Trump has been threatening to withhold funding from elite institutions.
The administration says it wants to stamp out anti-Semitism and prevent universities promoting divisive ideologies.
At the same time as it pushes an ideological agenda, it's slashing funding for scientific research.
As our health editor Natasha Loder says in this episode, it's a bit like doing surgery with a chainsaw.
In September, Natasha went to Boston for a health fellowship run by Harvard University.
While on campus, she talked to people directly affected by the government's actions to find out what it meant for them,
the grants that supported my research and the research of my entire team were terminated,
and what it might mean for the rest of us around the world who reap the rewards of that work.
If you know anybody that's ever had Alzheimer's disease, you know that they have good days and they have bad days.
The main drive of our research is to find ways to help people have more good days.
I'm Zanny Minton Beddoes, and today on the Weekend Intelligence, Natasha Loder tells the story of science under siege.
In May, we ran an episode marking 100 days of DOE, noting how federal cuts made under Elon Musk would have global consequences.
This week, we look specifically at the impact of the war on science.
In many ways, scientific research is an emblem of what America stands for.
Its labs are a magnet for the best international academics, a melting pot of ideas that all of us benefit from.
Today, Natasha gives us a snapshot of what happens when that crucial work is put in jeopardy.
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to the stage,
Breakthrough Prize co-founder Mark Zuckerberg and architect of the Fast and Furious franchise, the one, the only Mr. Vin Diesel.