2025-10-04
45 分钟The New President didn't like what he inherited.
William Humphrey was a conservative holdover at the Federal Trade Commission.
President Franklin Roosevelt was worried that Humphrey would stymie his anti-monopoly agenda.
So, FDR asked Humphrey to resign.
And when he didn't, FDR fired him.
Not long after, Humphrey died.
The executor of his estate sued, saying Humphrey was not fired for malfeasance or neglect of duty.
The Supreme Court agreed.
And for the past 90 years,
a case involving a dead man has set the precedent that a president does not directly control the heads of independent agencies.
For now.
I'm John Prado and this is Chex and Balance from The Economist.
Each week we take one big theme shaping American politics and explore it in depth.
Today, will the news Supreme Court term further expand presidential power?
It's set to hear cases on whether President Trump can fire the heads of those independent agencies,
the constitutionality of his tariffs and a raft of others,
ranging from gerrymandering to trans athletes to campaign finance.
With me this week to talk about the Supreme Court,
which has a big term starting next week with lots of cases that could reshape presidential authority are Charlotte Howard and Steve Cole.
Charlotte, how are you doing?