Banishing bottlenecks: how to improve processes

破解瓶颈:如何优化流程

Editor's Picks from The Economist

2025-09-11

5 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

A handpicked article read aloud from the latest issue of The Economist. Streamlined workflows can break down over time. To keep them flowing, they need constant monitoring and improvement, according to a new book, “There's Got To Be A Better Way.” Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • The Economist. Hi, this is Ethan Wu, co-host of Bunny Talks, our business and finance podcast.

  • Welcome to Editor's Picks.

  • We've handpicked an article we recommend from the most recent edition of The Economist.

  • I hope you enjoy it.

  • Very premature babies need lots of immediate medical attention,

  • which is why one neonatal team in an American hospital texted the acronym ELBW,

  • shorthand for extremely low birth weight,

  • to relevant clinical staff if they wanted them to get to the unit fast.

  • Unfortunately,

  • some recipients of this message took it to mean that a baby had a problem with its elbow and did not require an urgent response.

  • This excruciating story is one of many told in a new book,

  • There's Got to Be a Better Way, by Nelson Reppening,

  • a business school professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Donald Keefer,

  • a one-time operations executive at Harley-Davidson, who also lectures at MIT.

  • The author's premise is that many of the processes which govern work within organizations are broken.

  • Whether they are flawed from the outset or malfunction over time,

  • they need constant monitoring and improvement.

  • At the heart of the book is a simple instruction to managers.

  • Go and see how things actually work.

  • If you aren't embarrassed by what you find, they write, you probably aren't looking closely enough.