It is Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan pitched against his other three children,
Prudence, Elizabeth and James.
Rupert Murdoch took three of his children to court to ensure his media empire remains in the hands of eldest son Lachlan and a conservative force.
Given the the outsized influence that Rupert Murdoch's empire has and its role in being a sort of clarion of right-wing populism,
this is about all of us.
This isn't only one family's drama.
The HBO show's succession ended over two years ago,
but the real-world family saga that inspired it continued on.
Rupert Murdoch, patriarch,
and media mogul of all media moguls has always said that he wanted his conservative empire to stay in the family after he died.
As he entered his 90s, the question of which child would lead it became more urgent.
But as the HBO show dramatized, succession is no simple thing.
The Empire is held by family trust, and Rupert didn't get to dictate its fate.
The siblings fought, battled each other in court, family secrets spilled out in legal documents.
Staff writer McKay Coppins wrote the Atlantic's April cover story about the Murdochs,
and he spoke extensively with one brother, James.
By that point, the succession battle was between James and his older brother, Lachlan.
Lachlan is more conservative, more self-consciously modeling himself on their father.
James, meanwhile, is more politically moderate,
but he also spent two decades in the family business.