2025-08-06
16 分钟For Scientific American Science Quickly, I'm Rachel Feltman.
The White House recently proposed slashing NASA's science budget nearly in half and reducing the space agency's overall funding to just three quarters of what it received last year.
When adjusted for inflation,
the proposed fiscal year 2026 budget would be NASA's lowest
since the beginnings of the Apollo program.
But these days, NASA is responsible for much more than keeping up with the space race.
NASA's work touches our daily lives in ways most people never realize,
from the weather forecasts that help you decide what to wear to the climate data that helps farmers know when to plant their crops.
The stakes are so high that every living former NASA science chief,
spanning from Ronald Reagan's administration through Joe Biden's,
recently signed a letter warning that these cuts could be catastrophic for American leadership in space and science.
Today, we're joined by Lee Billings,
a senior editor at Scientific American who covers space and physics.
He spoke with one of those former NASA science chiefs about why this moment feels different and why the scientific community is sounding the alarm.
Lee, thanks so much for coming on to chat.
It is my pleasure as always, Rachel.
I am happy to be here, even though I wish the circumstances were a bit happier.
Right.
Things aren't looking great for NASA.
What exactly is going on with the agency's funding?