Why some of Trump’s big Supreme Court wins remain a mystery

为何特朗普的一些重要最高法院胜利仍成谜团

Apple News Today

2025-07-18

15 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

The House approved Trump’s plans to claw back $8 billion in approved funding for foreign aid. Experts told NPR the administration has provided little to no evidence to justify the cited claims of waste, fraud, and abuse. The Supreme Court is delivering wins for Trump’s agenda while often providing no explanation for its decisions. Bloomberg’s Lydia Wheeler explores why. The administration is trying to speed up deportations by making people they detain ineligible for bond hearings. Maria Sacchetti with the Washington Post tells us more.   Plus, the Department for Justice recommended a one-day sentence for a man involved in the raid that killed Breonna Taylor, Trump revealed that he has a chronic health condition, and CBS is bringing down the curtain on ‘The Late Show With Stephen Colbert.’ Today’s episode was hosted by Shumita Basu.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Good morning. It's Friday, July 18th.

  • I'm Shemita Basu.

  • This is Apple News Today.

  • On today's show, the Supreme Court keeps issuing emergency rulings in Trump's favor.

  • Millions of undocumented immigrants aren't eligible for bond hearings anymore.

  • And Stephen Colbert makes a big announcement.

  • But first,

  • the House approved $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public media that both chambers of Congress had previously agreed to spend.

  • Yesterday, we spoke about how those cuts will impact public media.

  • Today, let's focus on how the bulk of that money,

  • about $8 billion, was earmarked for global health programs and emergency food aid.

  • It's the first time in over 25 years Congress has approved a rescission request for the president to cancel already approved funding.

  • Congress members typically have closely guarded their power over federal spending.

  • But over the course of Trump's second term, members of his administration,

  • led by White House Budget Director Russell Vote,

  • have aimed to give the executive branch more control.

  • In this case, Vote, along with Elon Musk's Doge team,

  • argued to lawmakers that cuts were necessary to combat what they've described as waste,

  • fraud and abuse.

  • That message resonated with many lawmakers who ultimately supported the package,