2024-09-19
8 分钟The Economist Hi there, it's Jason Palmer here,
co-host of The Intelligence, our daily news and current affairs podcast.
This is Editor's Picks.
You're about to hear an article from the latest edition of The Economist read aloud.
Enjoy.
Let Truth and Falsehood Grapple argue John Milton in Areopagitica,
a pamphlet published in 1644 defending the freedom of the press.
Such freedom would, he admitted, allow incorrect or misleading works to be published,
but bad ideas would spread anyway even without printing,
so better to allow everything to be published and let rival views compete on the battlefield of ideas.
Good information Milton confidently believed would drive out bad.
The dust and cinders of falsehood may not yet serve to polish and brighten the armoury of truth.
Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli historian,
lambasts this position as the naive view of information in a timely new book.
It is mistaken, he argues,
to suggest that more information is always better and likely to lead to the truth,
the internet did not end totalitarianism and racism cannot be fact-checked anyway.
But he also argues against a populist view that objective truth does not exist and that information should be wielded as a weapon.
It is ironic, he notes, that the notion of truth as illusory,
which has been embraced by right-wing politicians,