Primacists v restrainers: China hawks are losing sway in DC

保守派与改革派:中国鹰派在华盛顿的影响力减弱

Editor's Picks from The Economist

新闻

2025-04-22

9 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

A handpicked article read aloud from the latest issue of The Economist. Donald Trump's foreign-policy advisors have split into warring tribes. We reveal why the conventional China hawks seem to be losing influence. Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Hello, it's Alice here.

  • I'm the co-host of Drum Tower, our weekly podcast on China.

  • You're about to hear an article from the latest edition of The Economist.

  • I hope you enjoy it.

  • Even before Donald Trump's tariff turmoil, it was hard to discern a clear China strategy.

  • With decisions depending largely on presidential whim,

  • his foreign policy advisers seem to have split into warring tribes.

  • To use a shorthand common in Washington,

  • the primacists seek to re-establish America's dominance in the world,

  • taking on all threats.

  • The prioritizers think America can handle only China and should abandon Ukraine.

  • And the restrainers want to focus on only the homeland, avoiding future wars.

  • Since April 2, Mr Trump's trade war has sown further confusion.

  • But whatever his own views, one thing seems increasingly clear.

  • Conventional China hawks, whether primacists or prioritizers,

  • are losing ground in the battle for influence.

  • Though overshadowed by the trade drama,

  • among the strongest indications of this trend was the firing or reassignment of six National Security Council or NSC officials,

  • which became public on April 3rd.

  • That was apparently prompted by Laura Loomer,