I'm Susan Lee. I'm a researcher and fact checker with The Daily.
What I do is make sure details in our episodes are accurate.
For us, every single fact in an episode matters.
The Daily is part of The New York Times.
We do everything we can to make sure we get the facts right.
Subscribers make it possible for us to do that.
If you want to subscribe to The New York Times, go to nytimes.com slash subscribe.
From The New York Times, I'm Michael Barbaro.
This is The Daily.
On Thursday,
the Trump administration's effort to abolish birthright citizenship finally ended up in front of the Supreme Court.
Today, my colleague Adam Liptak on the White House's unusual legal strategy for defending its plan.
and what it may mean for the future of presidential power.
It's Friday, May 16th.
Adam, always a distinct pleasure to have you on the show.
It's always good to be with you, Michael.
Let's talk about this case that was argued on Thursday before the Supreme Court.
It's genuinely intriguing
because it's not directly about President Trump's history-making decision to try to outlaw birthright citizenship,
but it's not not about his effort to ban birthright citizenship.