I'm Dane Brugler.
I cover the NFL draft for The Athletic.
Our draft guide picked up the name The Beast because of the crazy amount of information that's included.
I'm looking at thousands of players, putting together hundreds of scouting reports.
I've been covering this year's draft since last year's draft.
There is a lot in The Beast that you simply can't find anywhere else.
This is the kind of in-depth, unique journalism you get from The Athletic and The New York Times.
You can subscribe at nytimes.com slash subscribe.
The Supreme Court heard a case that could hand parents with religious objections a lot more control over what their kids learn in the classroom.
Or, more specifically, what they don't learn.
Today,
my colleague Adam Liptak explains how a case about children's picture books with titles like Pride Puppy and Uncle Bobby's Wedding has broad implications for schools across the country.
It's Friday, April 25th.
Adam, welcome back to the show.
I feel like we're talking pretty frequently these days.
Seems that way.
So we have had you on the show a lot recently talking about the growing constitutional crisis that is happening under the Trump administration in this country.
But I just want to acknowledge that that is not what we are going to talk about today,
because today we are going to talk about what feels like a very normal,
very interesting Supreme Court case that has some pretty big implications.