Episode #078 ... Marx and Kierkegaard on Religion pt. 2

第 078 集...马克思和克尔凯郭尔论宗教。 2

Philosophize This‪!‬

2016-01-27

23 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

Today we talk about Soren Kierkegaard and his views on the function and value of religion.  Thank you so much for listening! Could never do this without your help.  Website: https://www.philosophizethis.org/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/philosophizethis  Social: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/philosophizethispodcast X: https://twitter.com/iamstephenwest Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/philosophizethisshow
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Hello,

  • if you value the show as an educational resource and you want to be a part of keeping philosophy available for everybody out there for years to come,

  • support the show at patreon.com slash philosophize this.

  • Hope you love the show today.

  • So among historians of philosophy and people that just in general look at the thinking of Karl Marx,

  • there's not much of a consensus on how he felt when it comes to the subject of individual people and the relationship to the task of making moral progress.

  • It's too bad, really.

  • But the good news is for us as fans of philosophy, rather than, you know,

  • historians of philosophy or people that have to attach their identity to these people's thinking.

  • For us, the value of a philosophical concept really just lies in the idea itself, right?

  • What I mean is we don't need to necessarily understand the complex inner workings of Marx's brain as well

  • as he did to get value out of an interpretation of his work.

  • I mean,

  • as long as that interpretation produces some novel string of thought and gets us to think about possible assumptions we have in our thinking,

  • then it's really done its job for us.

  • So let's talk about a common reading of Marx.

  • What did he think about individual moral progress?

  • But we know a little bit about what he thinks based on what we already know about him,

  • you know, religion is the opiate of the masses.

  • But that statement in itself really doesn't tell us the whole story.