2019-07-02
22 分钟Hello,
if you value the show as an educational resource and you want to be a part of keeping philosophy available for everybody out there for years to come,
support the show at patreon.com slash philosophize this.
Hope you love the show today.
So for anybody not listening to these two episodes back to back,
I want to briefly remind everyone of the end of last episode
because the discussion on this episode jumps right in immediately where the last episode ended.
Real quick, the last episode ended talking about the ambitions of normativism.
Quote, the hope of liberalism was to get rid of the sovereign.
The reality of the world is that we have long periods of normalcy where the government does almost nothing,
punctuated by rare moments of extreme action whenever things actually need to get done.
Liberalism hasn't removed the sovereign from the political process,
and the only time pieces of paper like the Constitution prevent the sovereign from acting are during periods of normalcy when the sovereign wouldn't be exercising authoritarian power anyway.
To Carl Schmidt,
the biggest difference between our modern societies and the ones that existed in the pre-liberal world is
that the pre-liberal societies were just a lot more honest about the authoritarianism that was going on.
Nowadays we got this grand illusion of liberalism that puts a bunch of window dressing on the process and pretends the world is something
that it's not.
End quote.
So maybe the best place to begin our discussion today is just to say that the fact