2020-05-01
25 分钟Hello,
if you value the show as an educational resource and you want to be a part of keeping philosophy available for everybody out there for years to come,
support the show at patreon.com slash philosophize this.
Hope you love the show today.
So for a long, long time, the Enlightenment has been the whipping child,
paying for all the mistakes and all the transgressions of philosophers and leaders alike.
And this child has taken a lot of abuse over the years, it should be said.
First we had the counter-enlightenment, then we had the existentialists,
then we had the beginning of the 20th century, then we had the postmodernists.
But for all these thinkers,
and all the different ways they thought the Enlightenment had produced practically every problem we faced as a species,
there were just as many, if not more,
thinkers that came back at them with a very nuanced philosophical argument that's been used since the beginning of time.
And the argument was this, yeah, but still.
In other words, yeah,
turns out in retrospect we aren't using rationality to arrive at the intrinsic structure of the universe.
But still, who really wants to throw out the entirety of what the Enlightenment has produced in the meantime?
Do you really want to throw out all the technical understanding of the universe that science has produced?
Do you really want to throw out all the economic progress?
Do you want to just sit here, vacationing in France, deconstructing grand narratives for the rest of our lives?