2012-07-23
16 分钟This is bioethics bytes with me, David.
Edmonds, and me, Nigel Warburton.
Bioethics Bytes is made in association with Oxford's Uhiro Centre for Practical Ethics and made possible by grant from the Wellcome Trust.
For more information about bioethics bytes, go to www.
Dot practicalethics, dot ox, dot ac dot UK or to iTunesu.
A train is hurtling towards five people.
It's out of control.
You're on a footbridge standing next to a very obese man.
The only way to save the five is to push the man over the footbridge to his certain death.
His bulk would stop the train and save five lives.
So should you do it?
Should you give him a shove?
Most people would say no.
Utilitarians say, yes, you should take one life to save five.
Now it turns out that the answer you give will depend on how much serotonin there is flowing through your brain.
This raises an intriguing possibility.
In the future, might we be able to alter people's moral behaviour with concoctions of chemicals?
That's been the research topic of Molly Crockett, now based in Zurich, but formerly of Cambridge University.
Molly Crockett, welcome to Bioethics Bites.
Thank you very much.