2014-01-26
14 分钟This is philosophy bites with me, Nigel.
Warburton, and me, David Edmonds.
If you enjoy philosophy bites, please support us.
We're currently unfunded and all donations would be gratefully received.
For details, go to www.philosophybites.com.
Suppose there were only two groups of people in the world.
Those in the first group each had money and possessions worth 1000 pounds.
Those in the second group each had a million.
Now suppose you could reduce the wealth of each member of the second group so that they too had only 1000 pounds.
Overall, this might be a bad thing to do, but you would have made the world more equal.
So have you, at least in this regard, made the world a bit better?
Tim Scanlan from Harvard University has for many years been reflecting on the tricky issues raised by the concept of equality.
Tim Scanlan, welcome to philosophy Bites.
Thank you very much, Nigel.
It's great to be back.
The topic we're going to focus on this time is what's wrong with inequality?
Now we're focusing on economic inequality.
What is wrong with inequality?
Well, it's a puzzling question, because objections to inequality are objections to the difference between what some people have and what other people have.
And it's easy to understand why some people would like to have more money than they do.