The Fishermen Who Could End Federal Regulation as We Know It

据我们所知,可能终止联邦监管的渔民

The Daily

2024-01-19

26 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

On its surface, the case before the Supreme Court — a dispute brought by fishing crews objecting to a government fee — appears to be routine. But, as Adam Liptak, who covers the court for The Times explains, the decision could transform how every industry in the United States is regulated. Guest: Adam Liptak, a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Craft matters in small ways, like how coffee is made or how a wooden table is built piece by piece.

  • And in not so small ways, like how your money is cared for.

  • At UBS, we elevate investing to a craft.

  • We deliver our services with passion, expertise and meticulous attention to detail.

  • This is what investing means to UBS, not just work, but a craft.

  • Discover more@ubs.com craft.

  • The value of investments may fall as well as rise, and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

  • From New York Times, I'm michael barbaro.

  • This is the daily this week the Supreme Court heard a case that on its surface appears to be a routine dispute over a government fee.

  • In reality, it could transform how every industry in the country is regulated.

  • My colleague adam Libtak explains.

  • It's Friday, January 19.

  • Adam, welcome back to the show.

  • Hello, michael.

  • So, Adam, remind us of the essential facts of this case that just ended up before the Supreme Court a few days ago, a case that I know you see as among the most important and consequential of this Supreme Court term.

  • What on paper, is it about?

  • So this case is about herring fishermen in Cape May, New Jersey.

  • I went to visit them, and among the people I talked to was a fisherman named Bill Bright.

  • Well, I'm actually a first generation fisherman.

  • I've been fishing for 40 years.